Bangkok office View on Map
140 One Pacific Place ,Suite 901, 9th Floor, Sukhumvit Road, Klongtoey District Bangkok 10110, Thailand
contact@juslaws.legal
+66 91 040 9900
Call Back
Phuket office View on Map
The Royal Place (Next to Tesco Lotus) 96/66, Moo.1 Kathu Sub-district, Kathu District, Phuket, Thailand, 83120
contact@juslaws.legal
+66 91 040 0550
Call Back
Related Reviews
Professional and efficient!
Client review for Mr. Theodore A. Pianko | 26/03/2020
I recently got married, and I hired Theodore to help with our prenup agreement. From initial conversations to the signing date, he was professional but personable. We had a tight turnaround time (less than a month) and Theodore delivered seamlessly! He was easy to communicate with whether it was through email or phone calls. It was a pleasure working with Theodore, and I would definitely work with him again in the future.
Fantastic, Professional, and Responsive
Client review for Mr. Yuthana Promsin | 12/03/2020
was scared shitless calling lawyers to take my case, fearing the worst, until I spoke with Mr. Promsin. Immediately I felt confident and comfortable. From the beginning Yuthana was upfront, responsive and very professional. I knew I was in good hands after that first phone call. Upon meeting him all of my fears went away. He answered all of my questions and concerns and put me at ease. Unfortunately, the case could not be resolved my first time in court.
Pre-Nup Assistance
Client review for Mrs. Kunnika Limkul | 26/02/2020
From the very start, when i first met Mrs. Kunnika Limkul I was completely put at ease. I felt very comfortable and confident that she had my best interests at heart and would work very hard to help me with my suit. Kunnika was genuine, honest, patient, thorough and diligent. I highly recommend Mrs. Limkul and this firm. Having to go through a lawsuit is difficult enough and i was grateful to have a lawyer such as David on my side to fight for me as he did!!
Professional and efficient!
Client review for Mr. Theodore A. Pianko | 26/03/2020
I recently got married, and I hired Theodore to help with our prenup agreement. From initial conversations to the signing date, he was professional but personable. We had a tight turnaround time (less than a month) and Theodore delivered seamlessly! He was easy to communicate with whether it was through email or phone calls. It was a pleasure working with Theodore, and I would definitely work with him again in the future.
Fantastic, Professional, and Responsive
Client review for Mr. Yuthana Promsin | 12/03/2020
was scared shitless calling lawyers to take my case, fearing the worst, until I spoke with Mr. Promsin. Immediately I felt confident and comfortable. From the beginning Yuthana was upfront, responsive and very professional. I knew I was in good hands after that first phone call. Upon meeting him all of my fears went away. He answered all of my questions and concerns and put me at ease. Unfortunately, the case could not be resolved my first time in court.
Pre-Nup Assistance
Client review for Mrs. Kunnika Limkul | 26/02/2020
From the very start, when i first met Mrs. Kunnika Limkul I was completely put at ease. I felt very comfortable and confident that she had my best interests at heart and would work very hard to help me with my suit. Kunnika was genuine, honest, patient, thorough and diligent. I highly recommend Mrs. Limkul and this firm. Having to go through a lawsuit is difficult enough and i was grateful to have a lawyer such as David on my side to fight for me as he did!!
Professional and efficient!
Client review for Mr. Theodore A. Pianko | 26/03/2020
I recently got married, and I hired Theodore to help with our prenup agreement. From initial conversations to the signing date, he was professional but personable. We had a tight turnaround time (less than a month) and Theodore delivered seamlessly! He was easy to communicate with whether it was through email or phone calls. It was a pleasure working with Theodore, and I would definitely work with him again in the future.
Fantastic, Professional, and Responsive
Client review for Mr. Yuthana Promsin | 12/03/2020
was scared shitless calling lawyers to take my case, fearing the worst, until I spoke with Mr. Promsin. Immediately I felt confident and comfortable. From the beginning Yuthana was upfront, responsive and very professional. I knew I was in good hands after that first phone call. Upon meeting him all of my fears went away. He answered all of my questions and concerns and put me at ease. Unfortunately, the case could not be resolved my first time in court.
Pre-Nup Assistance
Client review for Mrs. Kunnika Limkul | 26/02/2020
From the very start, when i first met Mrs. Kunnika Limkul I was completely put at ease. I felt very comfortable and confident that she had my best interests at heart and would work very hard to help me with my suit. Kunnika was genuine, honest, patient, thorough and diligent. I highly recommend Mrs. Limkul and this firm. Having to go through a lawsuit is difficult enough and i was grateful to have a lawyer such as David on my side to fight for me as he did!!
Our Legal Cases
1100 Mr. Yuthana Promsin
Co-Founder, Managing Partner
Due Diligence in Thailand
A French biotech company, holder of several process patents for the extraction and purification of a compound with medical uses,
Number: dfssfgfgdg
Date: 04/18/2019
Result: won
A WIPO Arbitration of a Biotech/Pharma Dispute
A French biotech company, holder of several process patents for the extraction and purification of a compound with medical uses, entered into a license and development agreement with a large pharmaceutical company. The pharmaceutical company had considerable expertise in the medical application of the substance related to the patents held by the biotech company. The parties included in their contract a clause stating that all disputes arising out of their agreement would be resolved by a sole arbitrator under the WIPO Arbitration Rules.
Several years after the signing of the agreement, the biotech company terminated the contract, alleging that the pharmaceutical company had deliberately delayed the development of the biotech compound. The biotech company filed a request for arbitration claiming substantial damages.
See More
Several years after the signing of the agreement, the biotech company terminated the contract, alleging that the pharmaceutical company had deliberately delayed the development of the biotech compound. The biotech company filed a request for arbitration claiming substantial damages.
1100 Mr. Yuthana Promsin
Co-Founder, Managing Partner
Property and Land Disputes in ThailandCommercial and Civil Litigation in ThailandDebt and Judgment Collection in Thailand
A North-American software developer had registered a trademark for communication software in the United States and Canada.
Number: dfgfdghdfgh54646ngh
Date: 02/14/2020
Result: WON
A WIPO Software Trademark Arbitration
A North-American software developer had registered a trademark for communication software in the United States and Canada. A manufacturer of computer hardware based elsewhere registered an almost identical mark for computer hardware in a number of Asian countries. Both parties had been engaged in legal proceedings in various jurisdictions concerning the registration and use of their marks. Each party had effectively prevented the other from registering or using its mark in the jurisdictions in which it holds prior rights. In order to facilitate the use and registration of their respective marks worldwide, the parties entered into a coexistence agreement which contains a WIPO arbitration clause. When the North-American company tried to register its trademark in a particular Asian country, the application was refused because of a risk of confusion with the prior mark held by the other party. The North-American company requested that the other party undertake any efforts to enable it to register its mark in that Asian country and, when the other party refused, initiated arbitration proceedings.
See More
2100 Mrs. Marina Lashchenova
Partner (Russian Department)
Intellectual Property Litigation in Thailand
Number:
Date:
Result:
When is the Spring season?
Spring is the season succeeding Winter and preceding Summer. Spring refers to the season as well as to ideas of rebirth, rejuvenation, renewal, resurrection, and regrowth. During spring an important celebration takes place: Easter Day. It varies between March 22 and April 25 in Western tradition, and between April 4 and May 8 in Eastern Christianity.
See More
Services
Below you will find a list of our available legal cases. To get free consultation for any position simply click & contact us.
Due Diligence in Thailand
Commercial and Civil Litigation in Thailand
Investment Disputes in Thailand
Business and Trade Disputes in Thailand
Property and Land Disputes in Thailand
Criminal Court and Police Cases in Thailand
Book a Free Consultation to Discuss Your Case in Thailand
Bankruptcy Court Cases in Thailand
Intellectual Property Litigation in Thailand
Debt and Judgment Collection in Thailand
Class Action Cases in Thailand
Legal Actions against Government in Thailand